Webflow vs Framer
Two design-led site builders for client work. Both have free plans on a subdomain.
Verdict
- 1
Pick Webflow
if the client needs a serious CMS they'll edit themselves. The CMS starts on Premium ($25/mo billed yearly).
- 2
Pick Framer
if you want fast, design-led landing pages and small sites. Basic is $10/mo with a custom domain and 2 CMS collections.
Bottom line: Framer is faster and cheaper for small sites; Webflow scales better for content-heavy client sites.
Side by side
| Webflow | Framer | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid plans | Free plan + paid plans |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| What the free plan gives | The free Starter site gets 2 static pages, 1 GB bandwidth and 50 form submissions on a webflow.io address. Monthly-billed prices weren't shown in the view we captured. | Free gets a Framer subdomain, 1 GB bandwidth and 500 AI credits to try. The billing period for paid prices wasn't labelled in the view we captured. |
| Plans and prices |
|
|
| Month 1 (our estimate) | Starter: $0 | Free: $0 |
| Month 12 (our estimate) | Premium: $25 | Basic: $10 |
| Commercial rights | Not a content generator | Not a content generator |
| Learning difficulty | 3/5 CSS concepts like boxes, flex and classes are part of the tool. | 2/5 Design-first; feels like Figma. |
| Best for | Custom-designed marketing sites | Polished landing pages and portfolios |
| Watch out for |
|
|
| Sources | Webflow pricing | Framer pricing |
| Full profile | Webflow profile · Official site | Framer profile · Official site |
Every price and limit above comes from the linked vendor pages, read on . Month-1 and month-12 figures are our estimate of the plan a solo seller needs, not quotes. The order of the tools never depends on affiliate status.